Roundup for 2/11
I’m sure you’ve all seen the Google Art Project, a neat visualization of works of art in 17 big Western art museums. Official blog announcement. Behind-the-scenes blog from the Tate. This post at Curator by Nancy Proctor has comments from lots of smart people thinking about museum/web issues and is a great overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the project: the advantages of Street View technology over QTVR, major props for getting big museums to agree to this, the lack of searching across museums, interface issues and the questionable usefulness of the gallery metaphor. Since this project is all art museums I am also grateful that it is not called the Google Museum Project.
The Brooklyn Museum’s newest experiment is a game called Split Second, which requires you to make quick decisions about artworks to help plan an exhibit on Indian painting. Go do it now, they need lots of participants. Split Second in the NYT.
Shane Landrum has kicked off a Wikipedia Women’s History Project, in response both to recent reports of a gender gap among wikipedians and the paucity/incompleteness of women’s history articles. Could this be the straw that finally gets me to edit wikipedia articles? Maybe.
Rebekah Higgitt has been fighting the good fight for cultural history of science–contra folks who think that it’s not worthwhile to try to understand any kind of “pseudoscience” in its cultural context,and that doing so is treachery to a triumphalist vision of contemporary science. Much respect and gratitude to Becky. As a historian of quackery and (new project!) of parapsychology, there but for the grace of God go I.